Factors Affecting The Rate Of Enzymes Activity Biology Essay

Factors Affecting The Rate Of Enzymes practise Biology EssayEnzymes ar catalysts make within the gay dead system. Catalysts naturally, humble the activation energy required for play offions. The begin the activation energy is, the hot the estimate of answer is, and at that enthr peerlessfore enzymes speed up reactions in the body by lowering the activation energy required. (Diet-Health.net) on that point atomic number 18 umpteen factors that kick in to the calculate of reaction of an enzyme. Factors include closeness of the enzyme, temperature, pH take, constriction of the subst appreciate, and inhibitors. This lab shows the affects these factors lease on the stray of reaction amongst catalase, an enzyme install in white spudes, and heat content atomic number 1 peroxide, the subst dictate.The specific enzyme that was studied during this lab was catalase. Catalase is a naturally occurring enzyme that is found in umpteen living organisms ofttimes(prenom inal) as plants and the gentle reality body. Catalase breaks push down hydrogen peroxide, a very harmful oxidizing agent for cells (Catalase). A angiotensin-converting enzyme catalase molecule can break down millions of hydrogen peroxide molecules in a effrontery moment. Catalase breaks down hydrogen peroxide into piddle and oxygen. Hydrogen peroxide is a natural waste product which forms when the body breaks down fatty acids and converts that into energy. Hydrogen peroxide also forms when white race cells break down and kill bacteria in the body. Catalase is also face-saving in prevent the formation of carbon dioxide bubbles in the blood. Catalase can military service break down another(prenominal) harmful chemicals in the body such as alcohol, phenol, and formaldehyde (VitaminStuff.com).As mentioned before, enzymes play a significant reference in organic chemistry. Catalase is one of the most recognized enzymes found in living organisms. This lab provides the clear and u nderstandable information of the enzyme being studied, catalase, and proves the affects of the factors that contribute to an enzymes deem of reaction. vocalizationly 1 motley in Enzyme ingress evade 1Enzyme concentration compositionsDistance (cm) cadence (s)Rate of wobble (cm/s) approximately other observations100 % concentration (10 mL white potato vine juice)8 cm3.02 s2.65 cm/s bubbles appe ared80 % concentration (8 mL potato juice, 2 mL di allayed water)8 cm5.06 s1.58 cm/s few bubbles than previous composition60 % concentration (6 mL potato juice, 4 mL distilled water)8 cm6.28 s1.27 cm/s few bubbles than previous composition40% concentration (4 mL potato juice, 6 mL distilled water)8 cm7.5 s1.07 cm/s fewer bubbles than previous composition20% concentration (2 mL potato juice, 8 mL distilled water)8 cm19.65 s0.41 cm/s no bubbles appearedGraph 1Analysis 1 match to the observation representical record 1, the major trend shows that as the concentration of the catalase, whi ch is in the potato juice, step-ups in that location is also an ontogenesis in the localize of reaction. As the concentration of the catalase decreased, the rate of reaction also decreased.Part 2 Change in Temperature plug-in 2Temperature (C)Distance (cm)Time (s)Rate of Reaction (cm/s)10.08.005.851.3821.08.004.831.6635.08.002.992.6850.08.004.211.9080.08.005.521.45Graph 2Analysis 2Observation graph 2 shows the kin between the environmental temperature and the rate of reaction. According to the observation chart the optimal temperature was 35C. The optimal temperature being the temperature at which the enzyme reacted the fas audition. Any temperature higher(prenominal) or lower than 35C, the catalase molecules did non react as fast.Part 3 Change in pH LevelTable 3 issue forth of H2O2 (mL) essence of Distilled Water (mL)Amount of pH Buffer (mL)pH Level unsloped Distance Travelled by Filter Paper Towards MeniscusTime taken by filter paper record book to move to meniscus (s)Upwar d velocity of Filter Paper Disc (cm/s)10 mL5 mL7 (Control)8.156.61.2310 mL5 mL27.98.1516.650.4710 mL5 mL48.157.051.1610 mL5 mL98.110.40.7810 mL5 mL127.858.140.96Graph 3Analysis 3According to graph 3, the optimal value was the pH train of 7. At the pH level of 7, the rate of reaction was the fastest, any pH level higher or lower than that of 7 the enzymes rate of reaction would decrease. This relationship was much identical that of the temperatures, anything above or below the optimal value the rate of reaction decreases.Part 4 Change in Substrate ConcentrationTable 4Concentration ofH202 of Distilled WaterTrialTime of catalase to expedition from the back tooth of the test electron tube to the top (s)Distance of cigarette of test tube to substratum(cm)Rate of change of the catalyzed reaction (cm/s)15 mL of H2023%15.898.01.3626.868.01.17 full6.388.01.2713 mL of H202 2.6%18.138.00.9827.118.01.13Total7.628.01.0110 mL of H202 2%18.658.00.87212.88.00.63Total10.738.00.757.5 mL of H202 1.5%19.438.00.84212.538.00.64Total10.988.00.745 mL of H202 1%110.378.00.77212.888.00.62Total12.638.00.70Graph 4Analysis 4According to graph 4, as the concentration of the substratum (hydrogen peroxide) increases the rate of reaction also increases. This relationship was much homogeneous that of the change in enzyme concentration.Part 5 Addition of an InhibitorTable 5Experiment NumberAmount of Inhibitor ( pig (II) sulfate drops)Time (s)Distance (cm)Rate of change (cm/s)104.138.01.94214.688.01.71355.578.01.444106.668.01.205158.578.00.93Graph 5Analysis 5According to graph 5, as at that place was an increase in the drops of slovenly person (II) sulphate (the inhibitor for this lab) thither was a decrease in the rate of reaction. This was due to the fact that the copper (II) sulphate blocked the dynamic site of the catalase.Evaluation ConclusionFor for each one part of the lab, at that place were theory made in the beginning of the experiments. each(prenominal) experiment was through with(p) and observed and a conclusion was reached on whether the dead reckoning for the experiment made sense and was turn out.Part 1 Change in Enzyme Concentration surmisal If there was an increase in the concentration of the catalase, then there would be an increase in the rate of reaction.This hypothesis was proven to be true. As there was an increase in the concentration of the enzyme, the catalase, there was an increase in the rate of reaction. This was due to the fact that there were to a sweller extent catalase enzymes available for the substrates to bind to and soon react with. The concentration of the substrate was kept up(p) at the naturally available concentration, there were no changes made. That meant that there were much active sites available to the substrates to bind to. The to a ampleer extent than the active sites there were, the more substrates were being reacted at the same time, therefore decreasing the time it took to fully react with all the substrate molecules.Table 2 Change in temperatureHypothesis If the temperature of the environment surrounding the reaction increases the rate of reaction provide also increase, until it reaches the optimal maneuver, the point at which the rate of reaction volition start to decrease.The hypothesis was proven to be true as well. The rate of reaction did increase until it reached the optimal point. At the optimal point (35C) the rate of reaction was the highest, which meant the most number of hydrogen peroxide molecules were reacting with the enzymes during the experiment at that specific temperature. In other words, the optimal point was when the enzymes worked the best. As the temperature rose, the molecules possess more kinetic energy. The more kinetic energy there was, the more the molecules moved and collided with one another, increasing the rate of reaction, until it reached the optimal point. Once the temperature started to increase higher than 35C the catalase started to de nature, which meant the govern of the enzyme would start to differ. The denaturing catalase decreased the rate of reaction because there werent as many healthy normal catalase molecules to conserve the rate or even increase it.Part 3 Change in pH LevelHypothesis If the pH level of the substrate increase then the rate of reaction will also increase until an optimal pH level is reached. Anything above or below the optimal pH level the enzyme will denature.This hypothesis was also proven to be true. The optimal pH level was 7, neutral, for the catalase. This meant at pH 7, the most enzyme-substrate reactions were winning place at that specific time. Enzymes work within a flyspeck pH range, therefore pH levels tend to have a great impact on the enzyme-substrate activity (Nelson Biology 12). Any pH level above or below 7 started to denature the enzyme, slow down down the rate of reaction. Denaturing enzymes meant that the shape of the overall enzyme had changed. This meant that at t he pH levels of 2, 4, 9 or 12 the shape of the active site for the substrate to bond to would change, slowing down the process. At the pH level of 7, catalases activity was the greatest.Part 4 Change in Substrate ConcentrationHypothesis If the concentration of the substrate (hydrogen peroxide) increases the rate of reaction also increases.This hypothesis was proven to be true. This relationship was much like that of the concentration of the catalase. As the concentration of the substrate increased the rate of reaction also increased because there were more hydrogen peroxide molecules available to react with the catalase. However, at one point (the point of saturation, which wasnt achieved in this lab) the rate of reaction would be constant. That meant at a given point during the experiment, all of the active sites of the catalase would be occupied with a hydrogen peroxide molecule and the rate of reaction would neither increase nor decrease. purely looking at the experiment observe d, the rate of reaction was increasing as the substrate concentration was increasing because there were more substrates available to react with an enzyme at a specific time.Part 5 Addition of an InhibitorHypothesis If the chalk upition of an inhibitor increased then that means the rate of reaction would decrease.This hypothesis was also proven correct. The copper (II) sulphate acted as an inhibitor for the experiment. When added, the copper (II) sulphate attached itself to the active site of the catalase molecules, causing the rate of reaction to decrease. The copper (II) sulphate was meant to block the active site, which it did successfully, hence the decrease in the rate of reaction. This meant, the more copper (II) sulphate was added the lower the rate of reaction would be. This is because this inhibitor stalls the reaction time because there are less reactions taking place at that moment in time, due to the fact that the active sites are blocked off from the hydrogen peroxide molecules.Evaluation Sources of Errorthroughout this lab there were many errors made that were uncontrolled and/or unaccounted for. These errors were not human errors, which were tried to be reduced to the minimal if not none. somewhat sources of error included the test tube measurements, errors regarding the filter paper disc and the in concordant concentration of the catalase.The test tubes were meant to be all the same shape and hold the same summation. However this was not the case for every single test tube. To the human eyes the amount in the test tube might look the same but in reality the amount might vary. This is due to the fact that the test tubes from the inside do not all have the same shape, after all test tubes are human made and there is a chance of major human error during that process as well. The test tubes not being consistent meant that there was room for error in measurements. Even though the masses of the catalase and the hydrogen peroxide were measured out precisely, the measurements that were made using a ruler were not. This was due to the fact that the test tubes were not all the same, and that the human eye is not precise in analyzing such measurements. This meant there were innumerable errors throughout the lab.For many processes the filter paper disc, which was dipped in the potato juice, did not always sink to the bottom of the test tube. Even with the religious service of forceps and plastic pipettes, which were employ to aid the filter paper disc to the bottom of the test tube, the filter paper disc did not reach the bottom. This was because the catalase that was clothed into the filter paper disc automatically started reacting with the hydrogen peroxide. They were very inconsistent, some filter paper discs took a longer time to be pushed to the bottom and others simply sank, and since time was a major aspect to the lab this caused many errors.Catalase concentration was also a source of error. There were many potatoes tha t were launch and made into potato juice for the purpose of this lab. Naturally, they would carry dissimilar concentration of catalase because of the different ways they were grown. There might be a potato that had many nutrients while it was still maturing in the field and a potato that barely got any nutrients. The concentration of the catalase used in one part of the lab would be higher or lower than the concentration of the catalase used in another part because of the different potatoes used. This affected the lab because, like observed before, the higher the concentration of the catalase the higher the rate of reaction there will be. In the future, if only one potato was ground and made into potato juice would answer control this aspect of the lab.These were only lead main errors observed during this lab. There were many more, regarding the separate sections of the lab.Evaluation near Steps byout this lab there were many procedures that could have been done differently or t o a different point. Another lab could have been carried out with another natural enzyme which could have been comparable to the factors and affects of catalase. Also, the saturation level was undiscovered for the enzyme (in terms of concentration, and the inhibitors). Both are procedures that could have been carried to obtain a better understanding of enzymes.Another miniature lab would have been useful if done, because then the factors and the affects these factors had on the rate of reactions could have been compared for a better understanding. There is another naturally occurring enzyme that shares characteristics with catalase. This enzyme is called amylase. Amylase is a catalyst that hydrolysis polysaccharides starch into disaccharide maltose. Amylase can be found in the saliva, produced in the salivary glands and the pancreas. If amylase is added to starch solution, the starch will soon break down to form maltose (Enzyme Lab). Both catalase and amylase are natural occurring enzymes found in the human body and they are great for comparison with one another. If the same lab was done with amylase this lab would help others understand a little more in the similarities and differences between enzymes. cardinal other suggestion would be to carry out the experiments to the full potential. by and by reading and studying enzymes, it is clear that there are saturation points for the substrate concentration and the affects of an inhibitor (Nelson Biology 12). Saturation points refer to the point at which there is no increase or decrease in the rate of reaction between the catalase and hydrogen peroxide. The experiment that required the increase in the substrate concentration could have been (and should have been) carried out until the point of saturation was observed. This is when the rate of reaction stays at a constant because all the active sites are occupied by hydrogen peroxide molecules and no other reactions can occur. This could have also been executabl e with the inhibitor part of the lab. At one point no reactions would occur because the inhibitors would have been blocking all the possible active sites for the hydrogen peroxide to react with. This is also referred to as a saturation point. If these saturation points were observed, there wouldve been a better understanding of the affects the different factors had on the enzyme.For future labs, both these processes should be considered, if not acted upon. With both processes there is the availability to further the understanding of enzymes and their capabilities in living organisms.Work CitedCATALASE -ANTIOXIDANT BENEFITS, discipline ON SUPPLEMENTS, ARTICLES, LINKS, NEWS, ADVICE. VITAMINSTUFF A RESOURCE FOR VITAMINS, HERBS, ANTIOXIDANTS, AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE . N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Mar. 2010. .Catalase An droll Enzyme. Catalase Home Page (Index page for http//www.catalase.com). N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Mar. 2010. .Enzyme Lab Ex. 4. Welcome to Eve. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Mar. 2010. . Enzym es Enzyme Biological Catalysts Diet and Health.net. Diet and Health.net. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Mar. 2010. .Protein Digestion A Trip Through the Gut. Oracle ThinkQuest Library . N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Mar. 2010. .Substrate definition from Biology-Online.org. Life scientific discipline Reference Biology Online. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Mar. 2010. .catalase Definition from Answers.com. Answers.com Wiki QA combined with free online dictionary, thesaurus, and encyclopedias. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Mar. 2010. .The innocence in this world has become extinctThough, my purity still stands because my status is distinct.I have been refusing to give the green lightcontinually declining every inviteItholds all the respectIts just now not nice to relinquish in an hourOnce it is gone, its gone foreverIts just not worth it to meOne of my worst enemies is RegretAll the combat injury and all the pain is hard to forgetI dont want to be a statisticSo when it comes to sex, we speak of different linguistics.I must ad d that my mind is pessimistic.What if something goes wrong?What if its sadisticThey always ask me if Im clean.Give it up baby, youre already seventeenSounds like a kid to meI dont sock what the fuck you mean.Im just not you, one who lets lust consumeSeems like everyone lost it alreadyIn this I must say,My standards must be met for it to be given away.That man better love me to deathI better be the reason for his every breathBaby dont you crack the ring on that right fistBecause I dare that man to run off with my virginity