Pregnant Women Essay

In my opinion, meaning(a) women should be punished for partaking in legal behaviors such as taking fertility medication, smoking, and drinking, all of which toilette cause harm to the fetus. I think a cleaning charr should low-altitude her right to control her intent when she decides to change by reversal gravid or does become pregnant. Anything which might possibly harm the developing fetus should be forbidden and all things which might positively affect the developing fetus should be mandated under penalty of right, be it criminal or civil.Since anything which a pregnant woman does or does non do may guide an impact, any positive or negative, on her developing fetus, any act or omission on her part could render her liable to her subsequently innate(p) nipper. While such a view is consistent with the recognition of a fetus having rights which are superior to those of its perplex, such is not and cannot be the law of this state. A legal right of a fetus to begin life w ith a sound mind and body assertable against a fuck off would make a pregnant woman the guarantor of the mind and body of her child at birth.A legal commerce to guarantee the affable and physical health of another has never before been recognized in law. Any action which negatively impacted on fetal victimisation would be a go bad of the pregnant womans duty to her developing fetus, Mother and child would be legal adversaries from the moment of conceit until birth. If a legally cognizable duty on the part of mothers were recognized, thus a judicially defined standard of conduct would have to be met. It must be asked, by what judicially defined standard would a mother have her every act or omission magic spell pregnant subjected to state scrutiny?By what objective standard should a jury be guided in determining whether a pregnant woman did all that was necessary in order not to breach a legal duty to not interfere with her fetus smash and independent right to be born whole? In what agency would prejudicial and stereotypical beliefs about the reproductive abilities of women be kept from interfere with a jurys determination of whether a particular woman was negligent at any point during her pregnancy?Nevertheless, some make out that the medicine-addicted pregnant woman should be treated as if her drug use is the same as child abuse and at to the lowest degree one state domineering Court has apparently accepted that view. The Supreme of South Carolina, distinguishing itself from courts in twenty-four other states, has declared that at least inside the borders of South Carolina a viable fetus is a psyche and a pregnant woman who endangers its health can be engraft guilty of child abuse.The South Carolina court could not fathom the loss between a stranger who attacks a pregnant woman and the woman herself. The court argued if the fetus is not treated as a child under the law, then, there would be no basis for prosecuting a mother who kills her via ble fetus by stabbing it, by shooting it, or by other such means, yet a third fellowship could be prosecuted for the very same acts. The truth is that we do not have to pit the woman against the fetus to promote healthy pregnancies or to encourage life.In fact, creating fetal personhood hurts both women and the possibilities for healthier pregnancies. We could treat addiction for what it is, a health problem. We could fund programs designed to meet womens needs not only during pregnancy, but throughout their lives because we value women as whole persons. We could maintain peoples different values regarding fetuses without creating the legal fiction that fetuses are separate persons.